Friday, April 22, 2011
INVITATION
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Interpretation of the word “Partnership” for the purpose of CA/CS/CWA Act
2 At the time of enactment of the three Acts governing the professional Institutes, only one form ofpartnership existed in India, namely Partnerships under Indian Partnership Act, 1932. Subsequently,Parliament has enacted the Limited Liability Partnerships Act, 2008. Though Limited Liability Partnerships are bodies corporate under Section 3(i) of the LLP Act, the fact that LLPs are basically partnerships may be seen from the definition in Section 2(i) (n) :‐
“ Limited Liability Partnerships means a partnership formed and registered under this Act.
Section 2(i)(q) defines a partner as “any person who becomes a partner in the limited liability
partnership in accordance with the Limited Liability Partnership Agreement”
It is thus clear that a Limited Liability Partnership is also a partnership and its members are also
partners.
3. The matter of permitting member of ICAI, ICWAI and I ICSI was been examined in this Ministry.Acts governing these professionals were passed at a time when limited liability partnership did not exist. It is also clear from the definitions in the Limited Liability Partnership Act that such entities are also partnerships and their members are also partners. In the context of Section 2 of the Acts governing the professional Institutes, this interpretation is also not repugnant to the context. Accordingly, it is clarified that the words “partnership” wherever occurring in the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 and the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 shall mutatis mutandis be construed as including those Limited Liability Partnerships where all the other partners are natural persons(individuals). The word “partner” shall also be construed accordingly. This clarification shall apply only to these three Acts and not to any other enactment where the word “partnership’ occurs.
4. This issues with the approval of Competent Authority.
Interpretation of the word “Partnership” for the purpose of CA/CS/CWA Act
to be in practice. In all the three Acts, there is a provision for a member to be in practice when he is in
partnership with certain others. In the case of Chartered Accountants and Cost & Works Accountants, such
persons must be member of the same Institute, while in the case of Company Secretaries, it is provided
that the partnership could also be with members of such other recognised professions as may be
prescribed.
2 At the time of enactment of the three Acts governing the professional Institutes, only one form of
partnership existed in India, namely Partnerships under Indian Partnership Act, 1932. Subsequently,
Parliament has enacted the Limited Liability Partnerships Act, 2008. Though Limited Liability Partnerships
are bodies corporate under Section 3(i) of the LLP Act, the fact that LLPs are basically partnerships may be
seen from the definition in Section 2(i) (n) :‐
“ Limited Liability Partnerships means a partnership formed and registered under this Act.
Section 2(i)(q) defines a partner as “any person who becomes a partner in the limited liability
partnership in accordance with the Limited Liability Partnership Agreement”
It is thus clear that a Limited Liability Partnership is also a partnership and its members are also
partners.
3. The matter of permitting member of ICAI, ICWAI and I ICSI was been examined in this Ministry.
Acts governing these professionals were passed at a time when limited liability partnership did not exist. It
is also clear from the definitions in the Limited Liability Partnership Act that such entities are also
partnerships and their members are also partners. In the context of Section 2 of the Acts governing the
professional Institutes, this interpretation is also not repugnant to the context. Accordingly, it is clarified
that the words “partnership” wherever occurring in the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, the Cost and
Works Accountants Act, 1959 and the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 shall mutatis mutandis be construed
as including those Limited Liability Partnerships where all the other partners are natural
persons(individuals). The word “partner” shall also be construed accordingly. This clarification shall apply
only to these three Acts and not to any other enactment where the word “partnership’ occurs.
4. This issues with the approval of Competent Authority.
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Certification of e-forms under the Companies Act,1956 by the Practicing professionals
Saturday, April 9, 2011
PAN compulsory for DIN - New as well as Existing - For Existing File DIN 4 By 31/05/2011
Friday, April 8, 2011
Ses.217 amendment
Company Law – Director’s Relatives (Office or Place of Profit) Amendment Rules, 2011 – Amendment in rules 3 and 7
NOTIFICATION [F.NO. 17/75/2011-C.L.V], DATED 6-4-2011
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 642, read with sub-section (1B) of section 314 of the Companies Act, 1956, the Central Government hereby makes the following rules to amend the Director’s Relatives (Office or Place of Profit) Rules, 2003, namely:-
1. (1) These rules may be called Director’s Relatives (Office or Place of Profit) Amendment Rules, 2011.
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. In the Director’s Relatives (Office or Place of Profit) Rules, 2003, (hereinafter referred to as the said rules), in rule 3, for the figures “50,000″, the figures “2,50,000″ shall be substituted.
3. In the said rules, for the figures “50,000″, the figures “2,50,000″ shall be substituted.
4. In the said rules, for rule 7, the following rule shall be substituted, namely:—
The selection and appointment of a relative of a director holding office or place of profit in the company shall be approved by adopting the same procedure applicable to non-relatives :
Provided that, in the case of listed public companies, the selection of director for holding place of office or profit in the company shall have to be also approved by a Selection Committee.
Explanation.- For the purpose of this sub-rule, the expression “Selection Committee” means a committee, the majority of which shall consist of independent directors and an expert in the respective field from outside the company:
Provided that in case of unlisted companies, independent directors are not necessary but outside experts should be there in the Selection Committee:
Provided further that in the case of private companies, independent directors and outside experts are not necessary.
Monday, April 4, 2011
Filing of Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account in eXtensible Business Reporting Language( XBRL) mode.
Saturday, April 2, 2011
SEBI tells listed cos to run updated websites from tomorrow
Friday, April 1, 2011
NBFC can not to be partner in partnership firms
Gist of amendments proposed in the Karnataka State budget to beimplemented from 1st Apr 2011
Rule 7: Important ST notification - Accrual Basis payment for specified persons
Now, you can pay income tax at an ATM
DIRECT TAXES01/04/2011
No forms, no queues. Just go to your ATM and pay your income tax. The government on Thursday launched the new facility for tax payment and said it was to begin with open only to Union Bank of India customers but will be extended to other banks. Here's how it will work. The bank's debit cards holders will register on the lender's website. This site is in turn linked to the National Securities Depositories Ltd which will help validate the permanent account number (PAN) of individuals and the Tax Deduction Account Number (TAN) provided to taxpayers.